PENDESAINAN ASESMEN INOVATIF MELALUI PEMBELAJARAN PEMODELAN MENGGUNAKAN KONTEKS BIAYA RUMAH TANGGA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20527/pftfr122Keywords:
pendesainan, asesmen inovatif, pemodelan matematikaAbstract
Tujuan Penelitian adalah menghasilkan soal/masalah pemodelan matematika yang valid untuk asesmen/pembelajaran inovatif dalam Kurikulum Merdeka. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan penelitian pengembangan. Penelitian ini terdiri dari 3 tahap, yaitu analisis, desain dan evaluasi. Langkah analisis yang dilakukan yaitu analisis siswa, kurikulum, kebutuhan asesmen, pembelajaran, konteks yang dibutuhkan dan pemodelan matematika. Langkah kedua adalah desain dan produk. Langkah terakhir adalah desain evaluasi formatif yang terdiri dari evaluasi diri, one-to-one, experts review, small group, dan field test. Penelitian telah menghasil soal pemodelan matematika yang valid menggunakan konteks biaya rumah tangga untuk implementasi asesmen/pembelajaran yang inovatif untuk Kurikulum Merdeka.
The aim of the research is to produce valid mathematical modeling tasks/problems for innovative assessment/learning in the Independent Curriculum. This study used a development research approach. This research consists of 3 stages, namely analysis, design and evaluation. The analysis step is conducted by analyzing students, curriculum, needs assessment, learning, required context and mathematical modeling. The second step is design and product. The final step is the formative evaluation design which consists of self-evaluation, one-to-one, expert review, small group and field tests. Research has produced valid mathematical modeling questions using the context of household expenses for the implementation of innovative assessment/learning for the Independent Curriculum.
Downloads
References
Aksalnik, M., & Hill, B. (2004). Oral presentation to ‘Making Connections’, Assessment for Learning Symposium. Vancouver Island, Classroom Connections, Courtenay, July.
Alexander, R. (2012). International evidence, national policy and classroom practice: Questions of judgement, vision and trust. Paper at Third Van Leer International Conference on Education, Jerusalem, Israel. Retrieved from http://www.primaryreview.org.uk/downloads_/publications/public_lectures/2012/20120524_Van_Leer_Alexander.pdf
Andrade, H. L. (2019). A critical review of research on student self-assessment. Frontiers in Education, 4. http://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00087
Andrade, H., & Valtcheva, A. (2009). Promoting Learning and Achievement through Self-Assessment. Theory into Practice, 48 (1), 12–19. doi:10.1080/00405840802577544.
Artigue, M., & Blomhøj, M. (2013). Conceptualizing inquiry-based education in mathematics. ZDM Mathematics Education, 45, 797–810.
Aziz, M. N., & Yusoff, N. M. (2015). Using Portfolio to Assess Rural Young Learners’ Writing Skills in English Language Classroom. The Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Science, 3(4), 46-54
Birenbaum, M. (1996). Assessment 2000: Towards a pluralistic approach to assessment. In M. Birenbaum, & F. Dochy, (Eds.). Alternatives in assessment of achievements, learning processes and prior knowledge (Vol. 42). Dordrecht: Springer Science & Business Media.
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5, 7–74
Burke, K. (2010). Balanced assessment: from formative to summative. United States of America: Solution Tree Press.
Cech, S. J. (2008). Test industry split over ‘formative’ assessment. Education Week. Available from http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2008/09/17/04formative_ep.h28.html?print=1 (accessed 18 July 2020).
Celis, S., Quiroz, C., & Toro, V. (2019). Do not interrupt students’ work: How teacher interactions influence team's problem-solving capabilities. In P. Felmer, P. Liljedahl, & B. Koichu (Eds.), Problem solving in mathematics instruction and teacher professional devxelopment, (pp. 261-278). Springer: Switzerland.
Dochy, F., Segers, M., Arikan, S., Slaats, E., & Lindblom, S. (2023). Dialogic Feedback for High Impact Learning: Key to PCP-Coaching and Assessment-as-Learning. Rodledge: New York. DOI: 10.4324/9781003294139
Double, K. S., McGrane, J. A., & Hopfenbeck, T. N. (2020). The impact of peer assessment on academic performance: A meta-analysis of control group studies. Educational Psychology Review, 32(2), 481-509. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09510-3
Drobnic Vidic, A. (2015). First-Year Students’ Beliefs about Context Problems in Mathematics in University Science Programmes. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(5), 1161–1187
Earl, L. M. (2003). Assessment as learning: Using classroom assessment to maximize student learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
English, L. D. (2016). STEM education K-12 : perspectives on integration. International Journal of STEM Education, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594016-0036-1
Fitzsimons, G. E. (2019). Adults Learning Mathematics : transcending boundaries and barriers in an uncertain world. Adults Learning Mathematics: An International Journal, 14(1), 41– 52
Freudenthal, H. (1968). Why to teach mathematics so as to be useful. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 1, 3–8.
Gardner, J. (2012). Assessment for Learning: A Compelling Conceptualization. In Assessment and Learning. DOI: 10.4135/9781446250808.n17
Gardner, J., & Galanouli, D. (2016). Teachers’ perceptions of assessment. In Wyse, D., Hayward, L. and Pandya, J. (Ed.). The SAGE Handbook of Curriculum, Pedagogy and Assessment. DOI:10.4135/9781473921405.n44
Geisler, S., & Rolka, K. (2020). “That Wasn’t the Math I Wanted to do!”—Students’ Beliefs During the Transition from School to University Mathematics. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10072-y
Gravemeijer, K., Stephan, M., Julie, C., Lin, F., & Ohtani, M. (2017). What Mathematics Education May Prepare Students for the Society of the Future?. 105–123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763017-9814-6
Haralabous, A., & Darra, M. (2018). Eportfolio, Alternative Assessment and Student Self-Assessment: Exploration of the Correlation in Primary Education. International Journal of Learning and Development, 8(2), 80 - 101. doi:10.5296/ijld.v8i2.13097
Harland, T., & Wald, N. (2021). The assessment arms race and the evolution of a university’s assessment practices. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(1), 105–117. doi:10.1080/02602938.2020.1745753
Hoogland, K., Pepin, B., Bakker, A., de Koning, J., & Gravemeijer, K. (2016). Representing contextual mathematical problems in descriptive or depictive form: Design of an instrument and validation of its uses. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 50, 22– 32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2 016.06.005
Janisch, C., Liu, X., & Akrofi, A. (2007). Implementing Alternative Assessment: Opportunities and Obstacles. The Educational Forum, 71, 221-230. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131720709335007
Maksić, S., & Jošić, S. (2021). Scaffolding the development of creativity from the students‟ perspective. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 41, 100835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.1 00835
Mamolo, A. (2018). Perceptions of social issues as contexts for secondary mathematics. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 51(June), 28–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.20 18.06.007
Meyer, C. (1992). What is the difference between authentic and performance assessment? Educational Leadership, 49, 39-40
Muller, J. (2016). Authentic Assessment Toolbox: Portfolios. (jfmueller.faculty.noctrl. edu/toolbox/portfolios.htm.
Niss, M., & Blum, W. (2020). The Learning and Teaching of Mathematical Modelling. New York: Rodledge.
O’Connor, K. (2009). How to grade for learning, K–12. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
OECD. (2008). Assessment for learning formative assessment. Paris: OECD.
Offerdahl, E. G., McConnell, M., and Boyer, J. (2018). Can I have your Recipe? Using a Fidelity of Implementation (FOI) Framework to Identify the Key Ingredients of Formative Assessment for Learning. CBE Life Sci. Educ. 17:es16. doi:10.1187/cbe.18-02-0029
Panadero, E., Jonsson, A., & Alqassab, M. (2018). Peer feedback used for formative purposes: review of findings. In A. Lipnevich & J. K. Smith (Eds.). The Cambridge handbook of instructional feedback. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Parker, M., Ndoye, A., & Ritzhaupt, A. (2012). Qualitative Analysis of Student Perceptions of Eportfolios in a Teacher Education Program. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 28(3), 99-107. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2012.10784687
Putranto, S., & Ratnasari, G. I. (2022). Why i am confused to apply mathematics concept: student perspective of mathematics role in life. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 11(1), 538-549. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v11i1.4534
Riyanto, B. (2020). Pendesainan Pembelajaran Pemodelan Matematika Sekolah. (Disertasi Doktor). Universitas Sriwijaya, Palembang.
Riyanto, B. (2021). Developing mathematical modeling tasks using parking fee for learning mathematics. Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education, 11(2), 40-49. DOI: 10.20961/jmme.v11i2.57971
Riyanto, B. (2021). Pendesainan pembelajaran pemodelan matematika untuk pembelajaran berkualitas pada masa pandemi covid-19. Prosiding seminar nasional pgri provinsi sumatera selatan dan universitas pgri palembang 2 november 2021
Riyanto, B. (2022). Kepraktisan soal pemodelan matematika menggunakan konteks biaya parkir. Jurnal Santiaji Pendidikan, 12(1), 53 - 65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36733/jsp.v12i1.3833
Riyanto, B., Zulkardi, Putri, R. I. I., Darmawijoyo. (2017). Mathematical modeling in realistic mathematics education. Journal of Physics: Conf. Series 943(012049) doi :10.1088/1742- 6596/943/1/012049.
Riyanto, B., Zulkardi, Putri, R. I. I., Darmawijoyo. (2018). Mathematical Learning through Modeling Task in Senior High School: Using Nutrition Context. Journal of Physics: Conf. Series 1097(012102) doi :10.1088/1742-6596/1097/1/012102
Riyanto, B., Zulkardi, Putri, R. I. I., Darmawijoyo. (2019). HOTS on mathematical modelling approach in primary school. Journal of Physics: Conf. Series 1188(012088) doi:10.1088/1742- 6596/1188/1/012088.
Riyanto, B., Zulkardi, Putri, R. I. I., Darmawijoyo. (2019). Learning mathematics through modeling tasks in elementary school: using growth of population context. Journal of Physics: Conf. Series 1166 (2019) 012033 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1166/1/012033
Riyanto, B., Zulkardi, Putri, R. I. I., Darmawijoyo. (2019). Learning mathematics through mathematical modeling approach using jembatan musi 2 context. Journal of Physics: Conf. Series 1315 (2019) 012008 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1315/1/012008
Riyanto, B., Zulkardi, Putri, R. I. I., Darmawijoyo. (2019). Senior high school mathematics learning through mathematics modeling approach. Journal on Mathematics Education, 10(3), 425 – 444.
Rizal, K., Rochmiyati, Ambarita, A., Haenilah, E. Y. (2021). Portfolio assessment in primary schools. Jurnal Ilmiah Teunuleh The International Journal of Social Sciences, 2(2), 329 - 336.
Saadati, F., & Celis, S. (2023). Student Motivation in Learning Mathematics in Technical and Vocational Higher Education: Development of an Instrument. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 11(1), 156-178 DOI: https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.2194
Saadati, F., Cerda, G., Giaconi, V., Reyes, C., & Felmer, P. (2019). Modeling Chilean mathematics teachers’ instructional beliefs on problem solving practices. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17(5), 1009-1029. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-018-9897-8
Segura, C.,Ferrando, I., & Albarracín, L. (2023). Does collaborative and experiential work influence the solution of real-context estimation problems? A study with prospective teachers. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 70 (2023) 101040. 1 – 12. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmathb.2023.101040
Shen, B., Bai, B., & Xue, W. (2020). The Effects of Peer Assessment on Learner Autonomy: An Empirical Study in a Chinese College English Writing Class. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 64(100821). DOI: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2019.
Shin, S., Rachmatullah, A., Roshayanti, F., Minsu, H., Lee, J. (2018). Career motivation of secondary students in STEM: a cross-cultural study between Korea and Indonesia. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Guidance, 18, 203–231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10775-017-9355-0
Shulman, L. (1988). A union of insufficiencies: Strategies for teacher assessment in a period of reform. Educational Leadership, 46(3), 36–41
Skilling, K., Bobis, J., & Martin, A. J. (2020). The “ins and outs” of student engagement in mathematics: shifts in engagement factors among high and low achievers. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 1-25.
Stančić, M. (2020). Peer assessment as a learning and self-assessment tool: a look inside the black box, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2020.1828267
Tessmer, M. (1993). Planning and Conducting Formative Evaluation. Philadelphia: Kogan Page.
Torrance, H. (2012). Formative assessment at the crossroads: Conformative, deformative and transformative assessment. Oxford Review of Education, 38, 323–342.
Tsagari, D. (2011). Investigating the 'assessment literacy' of EFL state school teachers in Greece. In D. Tsagari, & amp; Csépes, I. (Eds.). Classroom-based language assessment. (pp.169-190). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Vos, P. (2020). Task Contexts in Dutch Mathematics Education. In M. Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen (ed.). National Reflections on the Netherlands Didactics of Mathematics, ICME-13 Monographs, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33824-4_3
Wiliam, D. (2011). What is assessment for learning? Stud. Educ. Evaluation, 37, 3–14. doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2011.03.001
Wiliam, D. (2013). Assessment: the Bridge between Teaching and Learning. Voices Mid., 21, 15–20.
Xuan, Q., Cheung, A., & Sun, D. (2022). The effectiveness of formative assessment for enhancing reading achievement in K-12 classrooms: A meta-analysis. Front. Psychol. 13:990196. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.990196
Yan Z., Lao H., Panadero E., Fernández-Castilla, B., Yang L., & Yang, M. (2022). Effects of self-assessment and peer-assessment interventions on academic performance: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 37, 100484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100484
Yin, H., González, C., & Huang, S. (2018). Undergraduate students’ approaches to studying and perceptions of learning context: a comparison between China and Chile. Higher Education Research & Development, 37(7), 1530–1544.
Zafiropoulou, V., & Darra, M.(2019). Students' Attitudes and Beliefs Regarding the Use of E-Portfolio as an Alternative Form of Assessment: Results from a Pilot Survey in Greek Primary Education. International Journal of Education, 11(1), 99-118. DOI: doi:10.5296/ije.v11i1.14350
Zulkardi. (2006). Formative Evaluation: What, Why, When, and How. Retrieved Nopember 2016, from http://reocities.com/zulkardi/books.html
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 SENPIKA
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
